2026-10-29 · BBC Business · English source

I earn £30,000. I'm angry there was no fuel duty cut in the Budget

Real-world example for IB, A-Level, AP and IGCSE Economics essays: Fiscal policy, Taxes, subsidies and price controls, Wages and income inequality

What happened

The UK Budget did not cut fuel duty, and a person earning £30,000 a year is unhappy about it; the BBC asked people with incomes ranging from £4,062 to £150,000 a year what they thought of this year's Budget.

The economics

A Budget is the central instrument of fiscal policy, through which taxes and spending affect households' disposable income and aggregate demand. Fuel duty is a tax on a particular good, so leaving it unchanged keeps motoring costs the same, which reduces drivers' real income and may dampen consumption. Comparing people across income levels also shows that one tax decision affects different income groups differently.

Figures to quote

  • £30,000
  • £4,062
  • £150,000

Evaluation

Not cutting fuel duty matters little to high-income households but weighs more on lower earners who depend on cars to commute, so the distributional effect deserves discussion; fuel duty is also often used as a corrective tax to discourage carbon emissions, and keeping it high preserves that environmental incentive.

Practice question

Using this example, analyse the effect of the government not cutting fuel duty on households' disposable income and aggregate demand, and evaluate the trade-off between fairness and environmental protection.

Read the article ↗

Where it fits in the syllabus

  • Fiscal policy: The government changes spending and taxation to influence aggregate demand and economic activity.
  • Taxes, subsidies and price controls: Indirect taxes, subsidies and maximum or minimum prices that governments use to change market outcomes.
  • Wages and income inequality: How labour markets set wages, and how income and wealth are shared across people.

中文版

发生了什么

英国预算案没有下调燃油税,一位年收入3万英镑的人对此感到不满;BBC采访了年收入从4,062英镑到15万英镑不等的多位民众,了解他们对今年预算案的看法。

经济学角度

预算案是财政政策的核心工具,政府通过税收和支出影响家庭可支配收入与总需求。燃油税属于对特定商品的征税,未下调意味着驾车者的用车成本维持不变,这会减少其实际收入并可能抑制消费。把不同收入水平的人放在一起比较,还能看出同一项税收政策对不同收入群体的影响并不相同。

可以引用的数据

  • £30,000
  • £4,062
  • £150,000

评估角度

燃油税不降对高收入家庭影响有限,对依赖汽车通勤的低收入者负担更重,因此政策的分配效应值得讨论;此外,燃油税也常被用作减少碳排放的矫正税,取消或下调会削弱环保激励。

练习题

结合材料,分析政府未下调燃油税对家庭可支配收入和总需求的影响,并评价该政策在公平与环保之间的取舍。

More cases on fiscal policy

All cases in the Economics Case Library

Cases are written by AI from the article headline and lead, using only facts from the article; every quoted figure comes from it. Read the original before citing.